Wednesday, March 16, 2016

The Veil and Obstacles in Bombay


In Bombay, Sekhar Naranyan travels to his home village to visit his family. As he arrives he encounters the beautiful Shaila Banu, a Muslim woman, and he instantly falls madly in love with her. Sekhar and Shaila begin a whirlwind love affair that drives them from the homes of their deeply religious parents to the modern city of Bombay. Sekhar and Shaila marry, and begin a new life together as husband and wife. The young couple give birth to two twin boys, Kabir and Kamal, and enjoy a few happy years together as a family before the country becomes embroil in religious violence spurned by the destruction of the Babri Masjid mosque in Ayodhya. In the end, the family learns that differences drive people apart, and fear of the other can internalize into outward aggression, while they walk a fine line as dual citizens of both Hindu and Muslim culture. 

            Veils are recurring motif in the film. When Sekhar first meets Shaila, her veil lifts up in a gust of wind, and her face is revealed. This invites the viewer to see the scene through the male gaze; we see Shaila as a woman, and her sexual nature is laid bare for Sekhar to pursue her as the object of his desire. When Sekhar stumbles upon Shaila in the village marketplace, she is dressed in a white sari without a veil. She is exposed to his gaze, and she avoids meeting his eyes. Without her veil she has lost the modesty and protection of her religion, yet throughout the ensuing dance sequence, the audience watches as her eyes begin to glance in his direction, and eventually linger upon him; in one moment, she forgets her dance moves, and for the first time we see her recognize him as a man, as a sexual mate. Later, when Sekhar is pursing Shaila and her friend, Shaila fools Sekhar into thinking her friend is she, but as she is leaving she lifts her veil and deliberately shows him her face. This foreshadows Shaila’s eventual revocation of her family’s religious values; she chooses Sekhar over the religion of her house, shunning the rituals of Islam for romantic love. Although veils recur throughout the entirety of the film, such as when a stray breeze blows a veil in front of Shaila’s face, the veil is seen more as a ripple f the past, an old reminder of the patriarchal shroud that Shaila has cast off in order to be with Sekhar.


            Bombay is an Indian Romeo and Juliet story; two tragic lovers who come from different families must battle to be together. Physical obstacles frequently conspire to drive Sekhar and Shaila apart, and the two have to find creative solutions to overcome. When Sekhar and Shaila conspire to meet in secret together for the first time, Sekhar bids her to come to the old fort by the edge of the sea. The fort is a symbol of authority, of rule and law, but it is overgrown with vegetation, signifying that the old order has been destroyed, and modern India now rules. Shaila then runs past an old anchor, which can be construed as a symbol of the weight of her subordination to patriarchy, but in the next moment her veil blows away, hinting that she has cast of the yoke of her subservience.

            As Sekhar and Shaila are waiting to be married at the courthouse, Shaila avoids contact with Sekhar for fear that people will see their public displays of affections. At this point, they are still afraid to be themselves around each other, especially Shaila. Once they are married, their relationship is legitimized in the eyes of the law, and although they haven’t reconciled their religious obstacles with their family, they at least are no longer afraid to be seen with each other. But even after Sekhar and Shaila are married they still face obstacles, for they are forced to watch over their landlords children and nieces and nephews during their honeymoon. The kids are a rampaging horde that can’t be controlled, and although they don’t care whether Sekhar and Shaila or Hindu or Muslim their presence dampens the newlyweds romantic coupling. In one of the most iconic scenes of the film, the children form a barrier on the floor between the resting forms of Sekhar and Shaila. The children play a game of telephone between Sekhar and Shaila, silently whispering messages between each other. When Sekhar says he loves Shaila the children shout out his message and the game is broken, symbolizing that love cannot be stifled if it is true and pure.

            Despite their different religions and upbringings, religion cannot keep Sekhar and Shaila apart. To them, religion is more liquid than solid, and the two frequently morph between the two; Sekhar even offers to change religions for Shaila, but she says there’s no need. Sekhar is pictured wearing a Muslim Taqiyah, and Shaila plays with wearing a bindi. Throughout the film, barriers rise up to separate the couple from physical threats from rioters to emotional appeals from their parents, yet nothing can separate them from each other. Through thick and thin they draw strength from their love for each other, and persevere in the face of any and all odds to prove that they are Indians before they are Hindu or Muslim, man or woman.

6 comments:

  1. Patrick,
    I really liked reading about the different symbols in the film. I think you provide some valuable insight into the movie through your analysis of the symbols. I was especially interested in the idea of the veil. The veil was one of the few things in the film that bothered me. First, that Shekhar was allowed (by the film) to use the religious symbol as a disguise to get closer to Shaila. On the one hand, it could be viewed in a somewhat positive light: he is "adopting" a piece of her religion in order to further their romance. However, it could also be seen in a much more negative light, and within the context of the film, with all the hatred and violence occurring between Hindus and Muslims, I was inclined to see it in this more negative light: Shekhar is taking something sacred and making it comical. It is amusing for the audience to see him dressing in a woman's veil and pretending to be a woman so he can get closer to his beloved, but when I saw it, I gasped in shock. Perhaps I am being overly sensitive and reading too much into the scene. I am sure this is not the only film to feature a scene like this, but in a movie about conflict between Hindus and Muslims, showing a Hindu male wearing a Muslim female garb seemed to be unnecessarily incendiary to me. The veil, as you say, is a metaphor for separation, and by wearing it, Shekhar is mocking the religious separation of Muslim women from men, as he specifically uses this garb to get closer to her. But, as I said, I enjoyed the rest of the film, so this one issue did not end up changing my perception of the film that much. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Patrick-

    I appreciated your interpretation of the veil and the many different ways in which it can by used to symbolize religious boundaries. I do tend to agree with Shelby that the veil his highly eroticized for the purposes of the film. I am not super familiar with Islamic tradition and I personally tend to view veils as male dominance over female sexuality. But I had to remember that Shaila does not view it that way. I really had to put myself in her shoes and once I did I felt very uncomfortable with just how comfortable Shekhar was with mocking Islamic veil rituals. Like Shelby says he dresses up in the veil to get close to Shaila and also kisses her through the veil several times. We also see that Shaila does not totally throw away her religion when she marries Shekhar, though she stops wearing the veil she still does the daily prayers so her faith is still something very important to her. In the city she is the one being made to feel lesser because of her religion not Shekhar, which leads us to see Shaila as an "other" who is bringing down a Hindu man. We do not see Hindu traditions similarly mocked or trivialized in the film.
    Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your interpretation of the veil motif is interesting as it feels like to some extent what you are suggesting is that the veil is like a repressive device that contains general human sexual instinct. The idea that removing the veil is also removing a "patriarchal shroud" seems plausible but when taking into account how Shekhar went about "courting" Shaila (following her, waiting for her creepily at her bus-stop, blaspheming his way onto her boat to school(?)), is it not just a replacement of subservient behavior to a sexual male gaze?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Responding to your post as well as the responses: the veil is, indeed, a complex symbol in the film. Building on our online discussion, Shaila not wearing the burqa in Mumbai could also just be an indication of the city's more liberal, plural environment as opposed to the village where identity is more feudal. When Shekhar's friend tells him that he will be punished severely if he is found pursuing a Muslim girl, he is pointing to the gender segregation in the village that is complicated by the separation of religious communities on the lines of kinship. So, Shekhar sees Shaila dancing at a wedding, not a village marketplace, and is able to imagine her as a romantic partner. The veil is used in the film as both a marker of conservative practice of Islam, but also a facilitator of love when Shekhar dons it, risking life and limb, because discovery means certainly loss of his and his family's social reputation and, perhaps, harsh punishment. I don't read it as sacrilegious, but it could be because the veil is not so loaded a garment in India; it is common to see women wear it as they go about their daily lives in the public space, driving motorbikes even. This ordinariness of the garment is quite different from the politically loaded connotations the veil has been invested with in Western societies where it is seen as female oppression as well as a signifier of the alien cultural identity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Feedback: quite a few interesting observations, Patrick, especially the reading of symbolism in the song 'tu hi re.' A sustained engagement with critical scholarship would add more layers to your discussion of the veil. Also, occasionally, the writing tends to become more descriptive than analytical, so pay attention to that; maintain the critical insight throughout the post.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Feedback: quite a few interesting observations, Patrick, especially the reading of symbolism in the song 'tu hi re.' A sustained engagement with critical scholarship would add more layers to your discussion of the veil. Also, occasionally, the writing tends to become more descriptive than analytical, so pay attention to that; maintain the critical insight throughout the post.

    ReplyDelete