Upon its
release, Kamal Amrohi’s Pakeezah
received predominantly negative reviews, and was considered a flop by both
critics and the public. It wasn’t until the death of the film’s heroine, Meena
Kumari, that the film gained popularity amongst Hindi cinema audiences. Now
viewed as a classic of the courtesan genre, Pakeezah
grapples with notions of female sexuality and the role of women in modern
India, and features a wealth of visual and audiovisual symbolism.
The film opens with a shot of Nargis
(played by Meena Kumari) dancing around a burning fire in the middle of a kotha. She is dressed in white, a symbol
of purity, and appears almost joyful as she expresses herself freely through
the artful motions of her dance. “The deepest allure of the figure of the
courtesan, Amrohi suggests, lies not in her sexuality per se, but rather in her
exquisite mastery of the arts of dance and song, whose expressive purity
conveys the essential value of the courtesan.” (Allen, 2009) While
traditionally a place of art and sexual freedom the kotha is framed more as a tomb than a stage. “Her body is itself
her tomb in the sense that although from her point of view her performative
body is conceived as a pure expression of spirit—as evoked in the opening
sequence, from the point of view of the largely unseen clients that she
entertains, it is, at least incipiently, available for their sexual pleasure.”
(Allen, 2009) When Shahabuddin enters the kotha
he is backlit by a square of light that makes him appear like an angelic
savior. The metaphor of the kotha as a tomb is further entrenched when Nargis
flees Shahabuddin’s home in disgrace to take up residence in a cemetery. By
taking up residence in a cemetery her environment reflects her emotional state,
alerting the audience that she is dead inside. After Nargis passes she is
buried in an unmarked grave, which symbolizes her lack of personhood as a
courtesan, because according to the film only married women are truly realized
persons.
Nature has served as a metaphor for
sexuality in literature throughout time and across cultures, and Pakeezah is no exception, with birds in
particular playing a special role in the film. The wealthy Nawab Khan gifts
Sahibjaan with a caged songbird, which casts the courtesan life as one in which
women are not free to make their own choice, or more accurately, not free to
pursue the life of a married woman. When Sahibjaan later frees the caged bird
she symbolically communicates that she is releasing herself from the “shackles”
of the kotha in favor of finding true
love. During the scenes at Salim’s forest camp Sahibjaan is enchanted by the pastoral
countryside, which stands in stark contrast to the gaudy décor of the kotha. The countryside symbolizes
traditional notions of romantic love, and acts as a sounding board for Sahibjaan’s
desires to escape the life of a courtesan and pursue romantic love.
During the
scene where Salim Ahmed Khan
first encounters Sahibjaan in the compartment of a train he is enticed by her
feet and the jangling of the bells that adorn her ankles.
These bells are a symbol of Sahibjaan’s sexuality and her art, but also
function as a manacle that tie her to the life of the courtesan. “The courtesan
figure camouflages a deep-seated anxiety about female independence from men in
its function as a fetishized “other” to the dominant female character, the wife
or wife-wannabe, whose connotation is so over determined in mainstream Indian
society that her appearance in Hindi cinema seems mandatory.” (Hubel, 2012) In the letter that Salim leaves for
Sahibjaan he remarks on the beauty of her feet, and tells her not to let them
touch the ground. His entreaty serves to enforce the notion that women should
shun independence and self-expression through work in favor of subservience to men
as devoted wives. When Sahibjaan reveals herself as a courtesan to Salim the
bells, which before sounded so enticing, clang with a clamorous tone, implying
that to be courtesan is a deplorable profession, despite all the evidence to
the contrary that has been presented up to this point in the film.
In one of my favorite scenes of the
film Salim rides up to his forest camp astride a horse appearing like a knight,
a heterosexual paragon of masculinity. The conversation that ensues between
Sahibjaan and Salim is conducted through the walls of the Salim’s tent. Salim
sees only Sahibjaan’s shadow, symbolizing Salim’s limited point of view; he
sees her as a fetishized sexual object rather than a flesh and blood person. Additionally,
he sees her as the woman he wants her to be rather than the woman she actually
is. The tent serves as a faux veil of purity that surrounds Sahibjaan and
cleanses her of her transgressions, but it also traps her within a structure
that compels her to perform the role of the demure and doting wife. On the
other hand Salim is outside the tent, and, as a man, free to do what he chooses.
There is a great shot the shows the Sahibjaan and Salim facing camera and speaking
to each other on each side of the tent. The shot implies that the structures of
society – the tent – prevent men and women speaking to each other candidly and
from understanding each other motives.
The symbolism in Pakeezah can at times be
downright obvious. The name given to Sahibjaan by Salim – Pakeezah – means
“pure,” and draws a clear association between marriage and notions of purity,
simultaneously casting the life of a courtesan as impure. At other times Amrohi's touch is more subtle and artful. The kite that gets in the tree at the Pink Palace symbolizes the cessation of Sahibjaan’s dream of romantic freedom. When we see it again the kite is in tatters, symbolizing that Sahibjaan has resigned her self to her life as courtesan. The historical
context of the courtesan as a sexually liberated artist stands in
contrast to the film's fetishized version of the courtesan as a slave to
immoral sexual practices and denied the benefits allowed honorably
married women. This combination of obvious and subtle audio and visual symmetry served to make Pakeezah a complex film that extrapolates both the hypocrisies and grace of the courtesan genre of films in Hindi cinema.
Patrick, how do you reconcile Sahibjaan's experience of romantic freedom in the pastoral space of the forest, as you note, with the rather restrictive role imposed on her during the interaction in the tent, that you have also observed? Is the film forwarding the view that she is free when bound by marriage?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePatrick,
ReplyDeleteI really appreciate how you pay attention to the symbolism in the film.
I like the idea how you interpret the name that Salim gives Sahibjaan as an indication of the purity of marriage and that the life of the courtesan is impure. Her refusal to his offer explains how desperate she is and the voices of those who are insulting her keep echoing in her mind that she will never be pure.
Patrick,
ReplyDeleteI really appreciate how you pay attention to the symbolism in the film.
I like the idea how you interpret the name that Salim gives Sahibjaan as an indication of the purity of marriage and that the life of the courtesan is impure. Her refusal to his offer explains how desperate she is and the voices of those who are insulting her keep echoing in her mind that she will never be pure.